California Court Says Crime Victim Is Not Allowed To Receive Restitution From Attacker’s Trust
A California Appeals Court says that it cannot order a trustee to pay restitution to a victim of a violent crime that was committed by a beneficiary of the trust—if a trust’s terms give the trustee discretion over whether to pay the trustee and the trustee hasn’t made any payments.
Division One was affirming an earlier ruling by a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, who said that he didn’t have the authority to order the trustee to use trust funds to pay Richard Young’s restitution.
Richard Young sustained injuries in 1997 after being shot by his brother Steve at his mother’s house in Woodland Hills. Steve was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to life in prison plus 13 years. Richard then sued his brother for his injuries, obtaining a $1.275 million default judgment.
Lucille Young, their mother, had amended her testamentary trust to name Kathy Jayne McCoy as her successor trustee. She also asked that the trust be held for Steve Young for the rest of his life. The remaining assets would go to the Christian Science Foundation after his passing. Mrs. Young passed way in 2005.